​
Context Engineering: The Next Paradigm

Most conversations about working with AI models start and end with prompt engineering. How do you phrase a request to get a better answer? How do you coax the model into doing what you want? This is solving the wrong problem. The constraint isn’t how you ask. It’s what the AI has access to when it answers - data, data, data. Context engineering is the discipline of designing, deploying, and governing the environment that AI operates within. It’s the difference between a clever demo and a production system. Between an AI that can chat and one that can act. Pylee is really a context engineering platform. We provide the infrastructure to build and manage context at scale through MCP servers, private registries, and governance controls. This is how you make AI useful, not just intelligent.

​
Prompt Engineering vs Context Engineering

The difference is fundamental:
AspectPrompt EngineeringContext Engineering
FocusCrafting the right wordsDesigning the right environment
ScopeSingle requestEntire system
LeverageMarginal improvementsOrder of magnitude gains
SkillWriting and iterationArchitecture and governance
OutputBetter responsesNew capabilities
Prompt engineering asks: “How do I phrase this question better?” Context engineering asks: “What tools, data, and constraints should the AI have access to?” One is tactics. The other is strategy.

​
What Is Context?

Context is everything an AI needs to understand and act within your environment. If you onboarded a human to do a task, what training do you need to give them and what do they need know in order for them to do it? It’s not just data. It’s the complete operational environment: Tools and Capabilities The functions an AI can invoke. Not just read-only queries but state-changing operations. Each tool comes with permissions, rate limits, and audit requirements. Context engineering means deciding which tools are available to which agents under which circumstances. Data and Resources The information an AI can access. This includes databases, documents, APIs, and real-time streams. But also metadata: when was this updated, who owns it, what compliance rules apply? Context engineering means structuring data for AI consumption while maintaining governance. Constraints and Policies The rules that bound AI behavior. Not just “don’t do harmful things” but specific business logic: approval workflows, spending limits, data residency requirements. Context engineering means encoding policy as infrastructure, not hoping the AI remembers instructions. State and History The memory of what’s happened. Previous interactions, partial results, rollback points. Context engineering means maintaining coherent state across distributed systems while enabling recovery from failures.

​
The Context Engineering Platform

Pylee provides the complete infrastructure for context engineering. Every feature maps to a fundamental context need:

​
MCP Servers: Context Sources

MCP servers are how you expose context to AI. Each server is a bounded context in the Domain-Driven Design sense: a cohesive set of capabilities around a specific domain. 
// A context source for customer operations
const customerContext = new MCPServer({
  name: 'customer-operations',
  tools: ['query_customers', 'update_preferences', 'process_refund'],
  resources: ['customer_database', 'support_tickets'],
  policies: ['gdpr_compliance', 'refund_limits']
});
Pylee handles the complexity of deploying these context sources: hosting, scaling, authentication, and monitoring. You focus on defining what context to expose.

​
Private Registries: Context Organization

Context without organization is chaos. Private registries are how you structure context into manageable, governable units. Each registry maintains its own context namespace with version pinning, access controls, and shared configuration. Teams can experiment in development registries without affecting production context.

​
Policy Engine: Context Governance

Context without governance is dangerous. Pylee’s policy engine ensures context is used appropriately: Access Control Who can use which context? Role-based access control (RBAC) determines which users and agents can access specific context sources. A customer service agent might access customer context but not financial context. Usage Policies How can context be used? Rate limiting prevents abuse. Approval workflows ensure sensitive operations are reviewed. Data masking protects personally identifiable information. Audit Trail What happened with the context? Every context access is logged with who, what, when, and why. This isn’t just for compliance. It’s for understanding how context is actually used, enabling optimization and debugging.

​
Version Management: Context Evolution

Context isn’t static. Systems evolve, capabilities expand, policies change. Pylee provides sophisticated version management: 
// Context evolution with zero downtime
{
  "registry": "production",
  "contexts": {
    "customer": {
      "current": "2.1.0",
      "rollback": "2.0.5",
      "canary": "2.2.0-rc1",
      "sunset": "1.x after 2024-Q2"
    }
  }
}
Version pinning ensures stability. Canary deployments test new context safely. Instant rollback recovers from problems. Sunset policies manage deprecation gracefully.

​
Context Engineering in Practice

​
Example 1: Customer Service Transformation

A financial services company wants to automate customer support. The prompt engineering approach would focus on “training” the AI to sound helpful and understand banking terms. The context engineering approach:
  1. Define bounded contexts: Customer data, transaction history, compliance rules, refund policies
  2. Expose via MCP servers: Each context becomes a secure, governed MCP server
  3. Organize in registries: Production registry for stable contexts, pilot registry for new capabilities
  4. Apply governance: GDPR compliance automatic, PCI data masked, refunds require approval over $500
  5. Enable orchestration: AI agents can now query accounts, explain transactions, process refunds within policy using consistent protocols and communication.
The result: AI agents that don’t just chat about banking but actually perform banking operations safely.

​
Example 2: Engineering Productivity Platform

A software company wants to accelerate development with AI. The prompt engineering approach would focus on code generation and review. The context engineering approach:
  1. Map development contexts: Source code, CI/CD pipelines, deployment configs, monitoring dashboards
  2. Create MCP servers: Each system wrapped with appropriate read/write capabilities
  3. Structure registries: Team-specific contexts, shared infrastructure contexts, production-only contexts
  4. Enforce policies: Code changes require tests, deployments follow approval chains, secrets never exposed
  5. Build workflows: AI agents can now implement features, deploy safely, respond to incidents
The result: AI that doesn’t just write code but ships and operates software systems.

​
The Context Advantage

Organizations that master context engineering gain compound advantages: Capability multiplication Each new context source makes every AI agent more capable. Add a new compostible MCP server, and current and future agents can use it. The platform effect accelerates value creation. Governance by default Policies apply uniformly across all context interactions. You don’t hope developers remember security rules. Pylee enforces them automatically. Evolution without disruption Context sources can be upgraded, replaced, or retired without breaking agent workflows. The abstraction layer protects you from implementation changes. Cost optimization Context usage is measured and attributed. You know exactly which contexts drive value and which are underutilized. Resource allocation becomes data-driven.

​
Why Context Engineering Wins

The AI industry is hitting the limits of model scaling. The next order of magnitude improvement won’t come from bigger models. It will come from new architectures that can better handle and control context. Consider the trajectory. GPT-3 to GPT-4 was a massive model upgrade yielding incremental capability improvement. But GPT-4 or GPT-5 with proper context (tools, data, policies) is transformationally more useful than GPT-4 alone. In many programmatic and product use cases, smaller models are already more capable than that they’re commonly being used for. This “capability overhang” shows that constraint isn’t “intelligence”. It’s context. Pylee exists to remove that constraint. We make context engineering as rigorous and scalable as software engineering. Because in the age of AI, context is the new code.

​
Start Engineering Context

Context engineering isn’t a future possibility. It’s a present necessity. Every day without proper context engineering is a day your AI systems underdeliver.
1

Identify Your Context

Map the tools, data, and policies that define your operational environment
2

Build Context Sources

Create MCP servers for your highest-value contexts using our Hello World Tutorial
3

Organize and Govern

Deploy private registries with our Platform Overview
4

Scale and Optimize

Monitor usage, refine policies, and expand context coverage systematically

​
The Context Engineering Imperative

In five years, every organization will have a context engineering team, just as every organization now has a platform engineering team. The question isn’t whether you’ll do context engineering. It’s whether you’ll lead or follow. The leaders are already moving. They’re wrapping services in MCP, organizing registries, and establishing governance. They’re building the context layer that will power the next decade of AI applications. With Pylee, you don’t need to build the context engineering infrastructure from scratch. We provide the platform. You provide the context. Together, we make AI useful.

​
Next Steps

Platform Overview

See how Pylee enables context engineering at scale

Build Your First Context

Create an MCP server to expose your first context source

Agentic Architecture

Understand how context enables the architectural transformation

Why Build MCP

The strategic case for context investment